Democrats have a surprising leverage point to stop the GOP's efforts to rig the House of Representatives during the 2026 midterm elections, according...
Vous n'êtes pas connecté
Utah Supreme Court has ruled a lawsuit alleging state lawmakers illegally nullified an anti-gerrymandering initiative passed by voters in 2018 can move forward, Court documents filed Thursday show.Proposition 4 demanded that an independent redistricting commission be created that would draw district lines non-partisanly.But the Utah legislature then passed Senate Bill 200, which diminished the redistricting commission to nothing more than an advisory role and continued allowing lawmakers to draw their own districts. The League of Women Voters and the Mormon Women for Ethical Government responded with a lawsuit saying the newly drawn maps were illegal. Read Also: White rural rage: The secret political force shaping America's futureThe legislature tried to block the case, a decision that went to the top court in the state. The Campaign Legal Center, which represents the petitioners in the case, called out the state asselmbly members, saying the case, "exemplifies how a ruling political party can skew the electoral process by 'cracking' voters from the minority party into multiple congressional districts to dilute their voting power."They asked that the courts block the maps for the next election.“When Utahns exercise their right to reform the government through a citizen initiative, their exercise of these rights is protected from government infringement,” the court ruled unanimously.“Although the Legislature has authority to amend or repeal statutes, it is well settled that legislative action cannot unduly infringe or restrain the exercise of constitutional rights,” the opinion continues.Read the full opinion here.
Democrats have a surprising leverage point to stop the GOP's efforts to rig the House of Representatives during the 2026 midterm elections, according...
Texas leaders have repeatedly claimed the state’s voting maps are race blind. Until the Trump DOJ disagreed.By Eleanor Klibanoff and Gabby...
The Trump administration's efforts to make Texas a less competitive state in the midterm elections could be sunk by the state's Republican party,...
The Trump administration's efforts to make Texas a less competitive state in the midterm elections could be sunk by the state's Republican party,...
A federal appeals court won't reconsider its decision in a redistricting case that went against two Native American tribes that challenged North...
Overview A California state court jury in San Jose has ruled that Google must pay $314.6 million in damages to approximately 14 million Android users....
Overview A California state court jury in San Jose has ruled that Google must pay $314.6 million in damages to approximately 14 million Android users....
After the Supreme Court ruled that the deportations could move forward, the migrants filed a new lawsuit, challenging their transfer on other grounds.
After the Supreme Court ruled that the deportations could move forward, the migrants filed a new lawsuit, challenging their transfer on other grounds.
U.S. Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas has long telegraphed his desire to gut crucial portions of the Voting Rights Act, and he might finally get...